September 10, 2004
I agreed with Stephen that this was enough to warrant a letter to my Congressmen. Today I got a response from Representative Tom Davis, VA 11th. Here's a couple of excerpts:
Under no circumstances do I believe we require international observers to validate our elections. America, while not perfect, has long maintained the lead in freedom and democracy. Furthermore, I am outraged at the notion that other members feel we require foreign nationals to conduct fair elections.
Further on:
I have personally gained an invaluable understanding of foreign governments by serving as an international observer during their elections. Nonetheless, the spirit in which international observers were called for in this instance was cynical and uncalled for; and I do not support it.
He makes a good point. Probably every US election is watched by international observers, not to validate or ensure fairness, but to see how to do it right.
Besides, even the best intentioned election monitors can be duped and made to look foolish. Isn't that right, President Carter?
Posted by: Ted at
04:00 AM | category: Politics
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 2 kb.
September 01, 2004
You. Just. Don't. Say. Things. Like. That.
No matter how much truth there is to it, and don't think for a second that he was wrong, because he wasn't. We can't win this war in a conventional sense. There won't be a peace treaty signed and POW's returned and victory parades, because it's a different kind of war. To Muslim radicals, it's not even really a war, it's a form of worship.
Admittedly biased, I think President Bush was speaking plainly, without nuance. I also think a lot of Americans will think about it and quietly agree without the defeatist hand-wringing we're currently hearing from certain quarters. It also gave Kerry something to be tougher on than the President, and that was an unexpected gift that he immediately siezed upon.
I read a science fiction book once (Star Trek?) where the last ragged remnants of terrorist organizations all gathered together for something or other. What stuck with me was the alternate history presented, where terrorist attacks had become more and more brutal and bloody until finally the entire world became disgusted and realized that there were limits to protest. Terrorism died out not because there were no more causes, but because it became unpopular and the results were opposite intended.
They weren't defeated, they became obsolete, but it took a lot of time and lives.
I really wish I hadn't remembered that book.
Posted by: Ted at
06:41 AM | category: Politics
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 278 words, total size 2 kb.
68 queries taking 0.0633 seconds, 144 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.