February 23, 2004
SQL
For our wonderful new work system, I'm having to learn more than the barest smattering of SQL I know. Any advice on some good books or website resources?
Posted by: Ted at
07:11 AM | category: SciTech
Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Tylenol. Lots of Tylenol.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at February 23, 2004 10:27 AM (UquFN)
2
Joe Celko's 'SQL For Smarties: Advanced SQL Programming' was recommended to me.
Yours,
Wince
Posted by: Wince and Nod at February 23, 2004 07:46 PM (3hZer)
3
Thanks Wince. Right now I'm at the beginner level. My training consisted of about an hour of general explanations, the rest has been all unsupervised OJT.
Yep, lots and lots of Tylenol. LOL
Posted by: Ted at February 26, 2004 07:17 AM (blNMI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 20, 2004
Now to convince my wife that they're common and vulgar
Diamonds, that is. Terribly terribly not-precious anymore
if these guys are right.
Thanks to Across the Atlantic for the pointer. Can you tell who the romantic is between the two of us?
Posted by: Ted at
07:18 AM | category: SciTech
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Heck the darn things weren't rare or precious
before this discovery. All men can thank DeBeers for that. Now if you happen to find an arguement that convinces your wife of this fact - well, I'll bow before your greatness.
Posted by: Kurt at February 20, 2004 01:06 PM (/7AX2)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Electricity is smoke
As
promised, here's another bit about the mysterious workings of technology. Once again, I found this on the newsgroup
Rec.Models.Rockets.
I have found most electronic devices are powered by smoke contained in small black chips.
In fact, once the smoke is released from one of these black chips, the electronic device will stop working.
Next lesson: Gravity doesn't suck.
Posted by: Ted at
04:33 AM | category: SciTech
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
February 16, 2004
Dark Suckers
From Michael M-B on the
Rec.Models.Rockets newsgroup:
What is a Dark Sucker?
Many years ago Thomas Edison was experimenting with a method to remove the darkness from a room. By applying a electric current to a wire in a vacuum, he noticed the darkness in the room had vanished. Where had the darkness gone. He noticed around the wire a area of extreme Non-Darkness. He surmised that in fact, the wire had absorbed all the darkness from the room and concentrated it about the wire. When he removed the current from the wire the darkness returned to the room. Hence the invention of the Dark sucker!
Nowdays we have many types of dark suckers. Even portable Dark Suckers called flashed darksuckers, which remove the dark from a concentrated area a short distance away.
With every brilliant theory, there are those who disagree. In the world of Dark Suckers, these heretics believe that darksuckers are in fact not sucking the dark away but emitting photons (or light). Now all of us in the scientific world know this is falacy. The easy way to prove it to these heretics is the Sun.
The Sun's gravity in fact sucks all of the dark from surrounding space. Therefore making it not dark ( very bloody not dark in fact). And the dark is sucked so violently that heat is generated in place of the removed dark. Even Einstein knew this.
So next time you walk into a dark room and turn the switch watch how fast the Dark is Sucked from the room!
Next Lesson: Electricty is smoke.
Posted by: Ted at
09:26 PM | category: SciTech
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 268 words, total size 2 kb.
February 15, 2004
The red one and the yellow one refused to comment
Math Secrets of M&M's Revealed.
M&M sweets pack together more densely than perfect spheres when randomly jumbled in a container, scientists say.
Redefines the term "sugar orgy", eh?
Thanks to The Group Captain at Across the Atlantic for this.
Posted by: Ted at
08:23 PM | category: SciTech
Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Only if I get all the green ones!
Posted by: Min at February 16, 2004 01:27 PM (hNqfO)
2
Yeah, but what about the packing efficiency of gummi bears?
Posted by: TL Hines at February 16, 2004 03:58 PM (dGwDL)
3
I think some scientists have too much time on their hands..
Posted by: Matt Navarre at February 16, 2004 11:42 PM (n/wkr)
4
Actually, there are practical applications for this. Everything from more efficient miniaturization to stability of chaotic structures to better ways to pack cargo.
Posted by: Ted at February 17, 2004 09:32 AM (blNMI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 07, 2004
Amphibious Cars
At work my friend Kyle and I were in one of those wonderful conversations that hop from subject to subject, and eventually we got to talking about
amphibious cars. Kudos to Kyle for finding that link.
Apparently, the idea is making a comeback. British company Gibbs is now offering the Aquada, which will do an impressive 100mph on land and 30mph in the water.
Or you can just go the do-it-yourselfer route.
Posted by: Ted at
10:25 AM | category: SciTech
Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 76 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That would be pretty useless here in Colorado. The only water we have is a few puddles that people fill up beyond capicity with their boats that can't even get up to full speed on them.
Posted by: Rocket Man Blog at February 07, 2004 03:47 PM (LiFHp)
2
Then the obvious solution is the airplane car! I'll have to Google that, we'd touched on those too. And jet packs.
Posted by: Ted at February 07, 2004 08:51 PM (2sKfR)
3
You know, an amphibious car is practicall for some places. Forget pulling your boat to the lake! Just drive it there... would save a ton of trouble with trailers, and maybe winterizing won't be as mahor an issue. On the other hand, how would a flying car work? The only thing I could think of would be a helicopter attatchment, because wings would get in the way on the road... don't even go there...
Posted by: Jamie at June 10, 2005 03:43 PM (BtNfK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 03, 2004
Happy Birthday
Gaston Julia
Google good. Fractals pretty. Math bad.
Posted by: Ted at
09:17 AM | category: SciTech
Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
1
math good.
math make rocket go!
Posted by: Rob at February 03, 2004 10:28 AM (rOi9m)
2
Math very good, you just can't get over your phobia of it...hehe. Love ya dad.
Posted by: Robyn at February 03, 2004 12:01 PM (JJNM/)
3
Thanks! Glad they had the other images there, I found a really cool wallpaper for work.
Posted by: Tink at February 03, 2004 10:48 PM (Pp0b1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
35kb generated in CPU 0.0193, elapsed 0.0899 seconds.
72 queries taking 0.0755 seconds, 195 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.