May 20, 2005
The scariest thing I've ever read
In 1815, Mount Tambora, on the island of Sumbawa, Indonesia, erupted in the largest and most powerful display ever witnessed by mankind. The eruption itself and associated tidal waves killed 88,000 people.
If we reduce all the ash from Tambora to dense rock equivalents and include all ash flow tuffs that formed at the same time, we come up with about 36 cubic miles of rock. Quite a bit compared with the destructive U.S. eruptions of Mount St. Helens in 1980 that produced about 1/4 cubic mile.
Wow. Except, that's not the scary part. Geologists have been studying a geologically active region that has in the past underwent events of unimaginable power, dwarfing even Tambora. That place is called Yellowstone.
The volume of volcanic rock produced by the first Yellowstone caldera eruption was about 600 cubic miles—about 17 times more than Tambora, and 2,400 times as much as Mount St. Helen's, an almost incomprehensible figure. One more statistic: Ash from Tambora drifted downwind more than 800 miles; Yellowstone ash is found in Ventura, California to the west and the Iowa to the east.
Yellowstone was created by three separate volcanic geologic events. The last may have removed the southern portions of the Washburn mountain range.
Read that last sentence again.
Here's a simple analogy:
Imagine a bottle of carbonated water lying in the sun. Pick it up, shake it vigorously, maybe tap the cap...boom, it blows off. Instantly the pressure in the bottle drops, the dissolved carbon dioxide exsolves into bubbles and an expanding mass of bubbles and water jets into the sky. In a few seconds, the event is over. Wipe off your face and check the bottle; some of the water remains, but most of the gas is gone. This simple scenario is a scaled-down analogy of what happened 600,000 years ago in Yellowstone when the volatile-rich upper part of the magma chamber vented and erupted the Lava Creek Tuff.
And a simplified reconstruction of the real thing:
Nearer the vents, fiery clouds of dense ash, fluidized by the expanding gas, boiled over crater rims and rushed across the countryside at speeds over one hundred miles per hour, vaporizing forests, animals, birds, and streams into varicolored puffs of steam. Gaping ring fractures extended downward into the magma chamber providing conduits for continuing foaming ash flows.
More and more vapor-driven ash poured from the ring fractures, creating a crescendo of fury. As the magma chamber emptied, large sections of the foundering magma chamber roof collapsed along the ring fractures, triggering a chain reaction that produced a caldera 45 miles long and 28 miles wide.
Yellowstone is three separate but overlapping caldera, and the area is still extremely active in the geological sense. So a reoccurance isn't necessarily imminent, but at some point, it will happen.
Victims of the Mt. St. Helen's eruption were found with their lungs, sinuses and mouths full of ash. We've already seen how relatively minor that eruption was. Here's what you'll experience if you happen to be too close to the action.
Hot ash flows are fascinating. Driven by expanding gas, they are really clouds of hot glass shards and pumice plus expanding gas whose turbulence keeps everything flowing like water.
Not that you'd experience it for more than a fraction of a second. Merciful, that.
So there you have it, the scariest thing I've ever read, and I meant that literally. The full text is here: Yellowstone Calderas, and I have Transterrestrial Musings to thank for the nightmares.
Posted by: Ted at
05:54 AM | category: SciTech
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 596 words, total size 4 kb.
1
The discovery Channel (or maybe it was TLC or National Georgraphic or any combination of the three) did a special on Yellowstone and it's staggering volcanic potential. I live over on the East Coast, so I think something like that would have an initially escapable effect on my life. Which would be cool, because it would be so devastating otherwise that infrastructure would crumble, meaning I wouldn't have anymore bills to pay. I could just drive down to Florida, take a boat to Costa Rica, and live out the last days before the oncoming ice age.
Posted by: shank at May 23, 2005 03:45 PM (+H1yK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 12, 2005
May 10, 2005
Tech Savvy Needed
My wife's PC finally gave up the ghost. The message we're getting is "Operating System Not Found" at startup, so I'm guessing something on the motherboard is kaput.
Fortunately we have most of it backed up, and what isn't we can easily recreate.
This PC has a new hard drive in it, which I'd like to remove and put into my PC. It's configured as the C: drive, and what I need to know is if I need to reformat it when I install or can I just rename it (D
? It'd be great if I could get the rest of the data off of it.
Any help?
Posted by: Ted at
07:30 AM | category: SciTech
Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.
1
No need to re-format unless you want a clean drive.
Hooking up a 2nd drive to anywhere but the Master slot on the Primary IDE controller will keep it from being assigned drive C.
Once the new drive is installed, boot to the BIOS settings to make sure the BIOS sees the new drive.
I think WinXP might let you use any drive for the boot drive & will recognize where the OS is located.
I think WinXP might even let you change drive C to another letter and it should still boot. I don't see any reason why you would want to do this, but XP lets you do it. XP won't complain, but I'm sure any application you've installed to drive C will complain.
In WinXP, to change the drive letters go to Control Panel -> Admin Tools -> Computer Management -> Disk Management (on the left). Right-click on any partitioned drive (in the top or bottom window on the right) and it will give you the option of changing drive letters.
The added drive will still have the OS on it, which is safe to delete and anything in the Program Files folder will be useless unless you re-install the application onto the new drive.
Posted by: Rob@L&R at May 10, 2005 09:29 AM (B0wmd)
2
You should be able to plug it in as D: and go--I did that with mine and Nic's computers. There are a few things you have to look out for, though.
In standard IDE/parallel ATA configurations, the boot drive is designated the "master" while the secondary is designated "slave," except in California, and you can probably figure out *that* Charlie Foxtrot. It's usually just a jumper setting, and most drives have the appropriate settings documented on the drive label itself. In other words, you might have to change jumpers on the secondary drive (Mrs. Ted's drive). Sometimes the cable does the selecting for you.
Take a look at the primary drive (yours) and the jumper settings and compare them to what the label says: If it looks like it's set for Computer Select (AKA "CS") set Mrs. Ted's drive for CS. If yours is set for Master, set hers for Slave, and I don't need to know what you're thinking.
Also, some computers have a data cable that only accepts one drive, and that's a whole other headache in that you have to get a new cable. The chipset should not be a problem, though.
New computers (last nine months or so) might use a new technology called Serial ATA, which uses different signal/data cables completely, and usually a different power supply connector as well. The data cable is narrower than the current 36-pin cable; the drives are not compatible. Some computers allow both types of drives, though.
Posted by: Victor at May 10, 2005 07:31 PM (Sx8zO)
3
Thanks guys. I've installed a hard drive or three over the years and knew about the master/slave thing, or at least enough to look for it. Mookie has a bud who's one of Best Buy's Geek Squad and he's volunteered to check the drive and retrieve the data from it. He thinks Liz caught a virus way back and it finally overwrote the backup cache or something. This problem with her PC has been intermittent for almost a year.
Posted by: Ted at May 10, 2005 08:04 PM (+OVgL)
4
I doubt it is the motherboard. I think your geek friend is right. Or perhaps a sector opened on that new drive or the read/write head is crapped out. Generally when I get an "Operating system not found" it means the bios is doing it's thing but the hard drive is not spinning (ie no lookie for OS). Verify that the drive is actually spooling up and spinning plates before you go to a bunch of trouble, or that it is not making an obviously wrong noise. Retrieve the data if you can by terminating it or slaving it as D in another machine, then you can shove it back in Liz's computer and do a clean reformat. Blow all the partitions and data off and you shouldn't have a problem.
It's the way of the windows brah. Reformat once a year or so. You can set your watch by it.
Posted by: bitterman at May 10, 2005 09:36 PM (94VhM)
5
I'm with bitterman on the reformatting once a year thing. Instructions always warn you that it's an all-day affair, but whenever I reformat, I'm usually back online and have my favorite programs installed within about two hours or so, start to finish. Then again, I only have a 7 gig harddrive. Don't know if that matters or not.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at May 10, 2005 10:39 PM (5Q/QD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
33kb generated in CPU 0.0485, elapsed 0.1075 seconds.
70 queries taking 0.0983 seconds, 180 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.