May 08, 2007
Eventually, on Rocket Jones
In keeping with my new motto, "All the news, when I get around to it", I figure I'll post something on the new cold fusion technique later this week. Maybe. I've also got coverage of Lileks' reassignment penciled in for next week. Now, if you're in a hurry or have a thing for "timely" news, well then, I guess you're in the wrong place, eh?
Posted by: Ted at
05:17 AM | category: Square Pegs
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
Underachievers
For the third year in a row, my beloved San Jose Sharks choked in the playoffs after having their opponents on the ropes. For sure, the Detroit Red Wings played great, their victory wasn't just handed to them. Too, the Sharks didn't roll over and play dead, it was a hard fought series.
Oh well. The Sharks played a great season, and I'm not forgetting that they're the youngest team in the NHL, including four or five rookies that played prominent roles on the team. They're just going to get better. Still...
Damn.
Posted by: Ted at
04:59 AM | category: Balls and Ice
Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Now you can hop on the Sabre's bandwagon. I think they're serving Labatts.
Posted by: GEBIV at May 09, 2007 03:37 PM (sWM/O)
2
Don't do it Ted. I put a hex on them since they slaughtered my beloved Rangers.
That is if you know what's good for you!
Muahahahahaha!
Posted by: michele at May 10, 2007 11:40 PM (wFOn1)
3
LOL
After my beloved Sharks were eliminated, I'm holding my nose while rooting for the Wings. I don't much care for the Sens or Sabres, and I loath the Ducks.
I'm more of a Lidstrom and Hasek fan than for the team itself.
Posted by: Ted at May 11, 2007 04:56 AM (B+qrE)
4
Can we have Bill Guerin back now?
Posted by: Brian J. at May 11, 2007 12:05 PM (CkCC9)
5
Please, take him. He's the poster child for underachievment.
As a player, I like him. As a trade-deadline acquisition by the Sharks, he was a major disappointment.
Posted by: Ted at May 12, 2007 10:31 AM (+OVgL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 06, 2007
In Defense of John Edwards
Ted must be being sarcastic, eh?
Nope.
Not long ago, presidential candidate John Edwards got roundly scolded by many for spending $400.00 for a haircut. This was wrong.
Edwards isn't your average guy, he's running for president of the United States. You and I could run too, but he's a serious candidate. He can't afford a bad haircut because that could (and probably would) destroy any chance he had of getting the Democrat nomination. People would look at him and snicker at the funny haircut, or, if he got it fixed somehow, would wonder why he got it cut so much shorter or made the extreme change. If he's been paying 400 bucks for a snip and is comfortable with the barber, then by all means he should stick with it. There's too much at stake to introduce a variable that could have such a drastic effect on his appearance, especially when he doesn't have to.
As for using campaign donations to pay for his haircuts, I'm trying to figure out why it's a bad thing. Is it the cost? Would there be a problem if it were a $50.00 haircut? People who donate to a campaign expect their candidate to do everything possible to win, and that includes looking good. Haircuts, healthy food, tailored suits, the whole package. So, not only should he keep getting the usual haircut, but if he cut costs during the campaign and goofed it with an unfortunate visit to Floyd, then as a doner I'd be one unhappy camper about it. Him paying out of his own pocket is fine, but I don't see the fuss with him using campaign funds to maintain appearances while he campaigns.
I don't like Edwards as a candidate. I don't much like anything of his positions on any issue (which all seem to involve me bending over so he can drive). But in this case, leave him be.
That's my .02, several weeks late.
Posted by: Ted at
08:07 PM | category: Politics
Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 336 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I think the issue is that he is the kind of person who was
already getting $400 haircuts. If he decided to upgrade for "no mistakes" insurance that might be a different situation.
Of course, I've always said to disagree on the issues, not the little stuff.
Posted by: Phelps at May 06, 2007 09:04 PM (5WsfS)
2
The issue as I see it is his campaign rhetoric about there being "Two Americas," and trying to position himself as the candidate for the "everyman."
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at May 07, 2007 11:08 AM (UquFN)
3
Well isn't that interesting. Empathy & media play about his wife's cancer lasted... what... 4 weeks. Coverage of his haircut lasted 1 week. I can't wait till they get to the real issues [rolling of eyes].
Posted by: michele at May 07, 2007 12:25 PM (BN/Fu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Baseball Blogmeet
Despite rather dicey weather yesterday, Liz and I went to the Potomac Nationals baseball game. Due to the Milbloggers conference in DC and other's schedule conflicts, we already knew that turnout would be light. Light, in this case, equals zero. Nobody else made it.
Along about the 5th inning, a very light drizzle started. A few umbrellas popped up here and there, but it never got worse than a light rain, and even then it was very brief.
The Nats were losing 4-2 at the top of the ninth when Liz and I decided to head for the car. Although we were taking the chance of missing a potential comeback for the home town boys, the thought of enjoying the fireworks from the comfort (and warmth) of our car in the parking lot was just too tempting to pass up. The fireworks once again were spectacular.
Victor and Nic have proposed June 16th for the Nationals vs. the Frederick Keys - in Frederick, Maryland. We'll have to check our calendar, but I'm almost certain that we'll be there for that one.
Posted by: Ted at
10:07 AM | category: Square Pegs
Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 185 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Hey, you might have better luck rooting for the Sharks!
Posted by: michele at May 06, 2007 12:13 PM (WRuJD)
2
Damn, Ted, I'm sorry to hear that. Believe me, I'd rather have been at that game than in Baltimore (no offense to your one and only true love--I'll tell all later). In all fairness to my one and only, she proposed the Keys/P.Nats game. I have nothing to do with it, unless you count supporting her proposition and driving her to the game as something to do with it.
Posted by: Victor at May 06, 2007 09:31 PM (l+W8Z)
3
No worries. We've gotten into the regular habit of going to these games this season, so even though it wasn't a group of us, we still had a good time. Someone from the PNats back office visited Liz's blog and left a comment, the concessionaires are starting to recognize us, and we're learning a few of the players.
Posted by: Ted at May 07, 2007 04:51 AM (blNMI)
4
You can start adopting PNats players to go with your rabbits!
Several years ago some friends of ours did become sort of a foster family to a bunch of the Keys. It was before they formalized the program the way they have in Woodbridge. It's been quite a treat for them as the guys moved through the system, since a few made it to the majors, if briefly.
I haven't been to Harry Grove in a few years, so I will try to get up there for a game before the 16th to scope out the accessible seating.
Posted by: nic at May 07, 2007 06:50 AM (l+W8Z)
5
I'm looking forward to the game, and to rooting for the "visiting team". I'll be there with rings on my fingers and bells on my wheelchair....Bunny
Posted by: Bunny at May 07, 2007 11:28 AM (+OVgL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 04, 2007
I Smell Organic Fertilizer
Today someone trotted out the tired argument about those "evil oil companies and their obscene profits".
Somehow, Starbucks (18.5%) and Google (69%!!!) get a free pass, yet the gas companies are supposed to give away their product because Joe Average doesn't want to pay market prices.
Milk costs a lot. When was the last time you saw a dairy farmer standing out front of the grocery store, giving out free half-gallons because he charges too much for milk?
Obscene prices? Have you seen what "organic" food sells for? Those freakin' hippies are robbing us blind.
Posted by: Ted at
09:25 PM | category: Square Pegs
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 103 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Obscene profits"? It is to laugh. You wanna know what's obscene?
Losses. Ruins everything.
That one year ExxonMobil made something like 38 billion dollars? I got a better percentage return on my 401(k). They'd be better served putting all their money into mutuals, and giving up the fuel business entirely.
Tell these jokers to start boycotting all oil companies until further notice, and enjoy walking to work.
Posted by: CGHill at May 05, 2007 08:56 PM (8cR/G)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 03, 2007
Swordfight? Really?
I have no problem believing the rest of this video (language alert and adult themes). Besides, who *doesn't* enjoy beating up on ol' Tom Cruise anymore?
How Gay is Top Gun?
Thanks to Owlish, who's back on the blogroll after falling off the radar a while back.
Posted by: Ted at
05:20 PM | category: Links
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Heh. The worst part is, I've got a straight friend in the Air Force, for whom if Top Gun isn't his favorite movie, it's close. And I can't show him that clip because I know while he'd think it's funny, he'd never watch Top Gun the same way again.
Posted by: owlish at May 04, 2007 09:01 PM (x4LaK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 02, 2007
Oh Sure, You're Laughing Now
Like they say, the longest journey starts with a single step, and this is a baby step to be sure. Still, it's a start. Measurable progress. And some day, when I rule the world with my invincible army of sharks with frickin' laser beams on their heads, you'll remember this and wonder how you could have been so blind.
I've already decided on my mini-me too.
He's the right shape, and has that vaguely disturbing smile that makes you wonder what he's been up to. I'm not sure about the color though... unless it's because he's jaundiced. Yeah, that's it. Jaundiced, in every sense of the word.
Someday, people.
Posted by: Ted at
04:08 PM | category: Square Pegs
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 119 words, total size 1 kb.
Somebody Didn't Get the Memo
I was
kidding, guys.
Yet over at QandO, they found someone who isn't.
Posted by: Ted at
11:38 AM | category: Links
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I almost sent that link to you yesterday. It was set up by someone who's actually poking fun at 9/11 'truthers' like Rosie who believe fire can't melt steel.
(To be fair, the 'truthers' are factually correct...but fire can heat steel to the point it loses its strength. But the ignorant refuse to believe that had anything to do w/ the collapse of the towers.)
Posted by: Victor at May 03, 2007 10:38 AM (1oGDT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 01, 2007
Surprising
Rocket Jones is number one if you search Google for "Buckethead Son".
Posted by: Ted at
05:29 AM | category: Links
Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
1
not to brag, but I'm number one if you search "butt plugs for bears."
At least I was a couple days ago. I'm quite proud.
Posted by: Derek at May 01, 2007 09:58 AM (FloaD)
2
Strange that perfidy doesn't even register on either "buckethead son" or "buckethead." The failure on the latter is thanks to the idiot guitar player, but you'd think I'd score higher on the other.
Posted by: buckethead at May 02, 2007 10:02 AM (3huuu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Career Advice
Dear Baseball Player,
I assume that you get to pick the music that plays when you come up to bat. Please rethink your choice. Do you really want management to hear Dire Straits' Money for Nothing every time you step up to the plate?
Ted
more...
Posted by: Ted at
04:57 AM | category: Square Pegs
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I won't be attending, thanks to the milblogger conference this weekend. But next time, I'll be there.
Posted by: buckethead at May 02, 2007 10:06 AM (3huuu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
47kb generated in CPU 0.022, elapsed 0.178 seconds.
78 queries taking 0.163 seconds, 228 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.