December 29, 2007

Two for the "What the hell?" File

This weekend I've watched two of the oddest flicks I've ever seen. Both were very beautiful to watch, with powerful visuals and memorable scenes. I'll never watch either again, because for all their reputation and supposed greatness, I just wasn't that impressed.

Eraserhead - David Lynch's first movie. An hour and a half of strange nonsense that kind of tells a story. I've said before that as a youngster I would've been wowed by something like this, digging deep for hidden meaning and substance. Now that I'm older and jaded, I believe that Lynch just throws weird shit on screen for the sake of being weird.

Audition - I'm kind of a Takashi Miike fan (he did Happiness of the Katakuris), but this movie dragged horribly. At an hour and ten minutes Mookie and I were rewarded with something other than long, slow, meandering conversation. I wanted to love this, really I did! I would've settled for like, even. Nope, not even that. It was disturbing and terrifying at times, but mostly it was just yawn-inducing. And for God's sake, would someone give that lead actress something to eat?!? Every time she asked, "what are you thinking about?", my first thought was, "Dachau."

Two misses, but at least now I can say I saw them. And debate those who claim these are masterpieces. Sometimes it's possible to be *too* artsy.

Posted by: Ted at 09:35 PM | category: Cult Flicks
Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 244 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I'm kinda with you on the Lynch assessment, although I admit I find his stuff "angular and disturbing to the point of insanity." We have Eraserhead but I've yet to watch it. I will always love the Log Lady.

Posted by: dogette at December 31, 2007 12:29 PM (q/UVc)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
23kb generated in CPU 0.0435, elapsed 0.1133 seconds.
70 queries taking 0.1062 seconds, 188 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.