February 13, 2004
In further Valentine's Day news...
From the inestimable
Pixy:
This one is for Susie, Cherry, Jennifer, Mookie, LeeAnn, Roxette, Stevie, Heather, Helen, Linda, Annika and Sarah:
Throw Rocks At Boys
I wholeheartedly agree ladies, thank you for making this a nicer and more interesting year. I'd also like to add to that list:
Shell, Candy, Carol, Dawn, Min, Margi, Dana, Anna, Lynn, Serenity, Nic, Kelley, Tas, Tink, Dawn, and Denita.
Happy Valentine's Day to you all.
I considered sending individual ecards to everyone, but I'm just not that thoughtful. Ask my wife. Although this year I did get her a very nice gold bracelet. She showed it to me last night. I have impeccable taste.
Posted by: Ted at
08:00 AM | category: Links
Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Awwww, Happy Valentine's Day back at'cha, ya big lug! :-)
--TwoDragons
Posted by: Denita TwoDragons at February 14, 2004 12:28 AM (Sg245)
2
This is e-card enough. Back atcha.
Posted by: Anna at February 14, 2004 02:31 AM (TF5Pc)
3
Happy V Day to you too Ted!
Posted by: Tink at February 14, 2004 10:19 PM (Pp0b1)
4
This was perfect for me -- it fits, it works and it's sweet like you!
Posted by: Dawn at February 15, 2004 03:51 AM (Q0xHi)
5
Love is a path to the heart that knows its own way.
Posted by: Lamar Cole at October 26, 2005 04:36 PM (04NZk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Another anti-Valentine's day site
Black Hearts Party.
Gifts for that 'special' one on your list and much much more.
Posted by: Ted at
06:14 AM | category: Links
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
It takes a certain mad genius
...and
Bunsen has it.
Here he presents a 10-question quiz where each answer is either Courtney Love or Westminster Dog Show Entrant.
This reminds me of an old David Letterman Top Ten list , something about "Favorite Body Parts or Van Pattens". The number one answer was "Dick".
Posted by: Ted at
05:49 AM | category: Links
Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Without clicking on the link I'm guessing the #1 is "Bitch."
Posted by: Tuning Spork at February 13, 2004 10:06 PM (fdKPo)
2
Boy, was I wrong! LOL!!
But #9 was close...
Posted by: Tuning Spork at February 13, 2004 10:09 PM (fdKPo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 12, 2004
Dog as deadly force
US military working dogs are of two types (that I know of). There are drug-detection dogs and bomb-detection dogs. Both kinds can do duty as a guard dog, but basically it's taking advantage of their keen senses, the training for the guard role is limited since they focus on their primary function. After the Vietnam conflict, so-called 'sentry' dogs were phased out because they were ultra-agressive and somewhat unpredictable. Military dogs aren't pets, they're tools bred and trained to do a specific job, and turning one loose against someone is considered using 'deadly force'.
I don't know much about police dog training. I suspect that police dogs are taught more in the way of apprehension techniques and keeping a perpetrator at bay and under control.
A while back The Meatriarch did a fine two-part series (here and here) on canine breeds who fit the bill if you need serious protection and are prepared to spend the time and effort in order to be a responsible owner to one. Everyone should read these, for informational purposes if nothing else, because the average person does not equate dogs with overwhelming deadly force.
Posted by: Ted at
08:37 PM | category: Links
Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 198 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I used to train police dogs in college. Just about any breed can be a good guard dog. ANy large dog can make a good police dog because to the dog, it's all a game. Any dog with high play drive can be taught.
Posted by: SayUncle at February 12, 2004 10:47 PM (Kn1pY)
2
Really? Just a very rough kind of play? I had no idea, that's interesting.
Posted by: Ted at February 13, 2004 06:01 AM (2sKfR)
3
SayUncle is exactly right. To the dog any type of training is a form of play.
That's why you can get any dog to to almost anything if you frame in that reference.
There is even an excellent book out there called: Play Training Your Dog.
The military and to a certain degree most police and protection dogs are selected for characteristics that make them easily suited to the work: I.e they can be trained quickly.
Those dogs are often very high drive and very dominant something that makes them very challenging to have around the house as pets.
The drive means they will always want to be busy which means if you aren't "playing" with them they will find a way to amuse themselves. This often involves chewing things - lots of things.
The dominance means they will always challenge you for pack leadership so you have to be continually on your guard. This is where most people get into trouble.
Many military/police dogs are also quite stubborn and hard headed (GSD in particular) and this is why they make good candidates for that type of training - they tend to be more forgiving of "handler error" in the training process.
Dogs that wash out don't necessarily lack the potential to do the work - they just need a more patient approach and military/police forces don't have the time (or sometimes the training methods) to achieve that.
This is why there are more GSDs than Malinois in those applications eventhough the Mal is generally faster, smarter, and with higher drive. It is known for having a longer memory for "handler error" which leads to training issues.
Posted by: The Meatriarchy at February 13, 2004 10:57 AM (x3H0D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yeah, I own a poodle, what of it?
Poodles were originally bred as hunting dogs, and here's the lowdown on why poodle haircuts are so weird, courtesy of
Slate, via
J-Walk Blog.
An unshorn poodle's thick coat could weigh it down in the water. With the bottom half of its body shaved, the animal was more buoyant and could swim more freely. The long mane and hair around the chest were left intact to keep the poodle's vital organs warm in the cold water, and owners also kept the hair around the joints to protect them from cold and injury and to help prevent rheumatism.
Shaving the hair around the face left the poodle's mouth and eyes free so it could fulfill its retrieving responsibilities, and tying the hair on a poodle's head into a "top knot" also kept hair out of its eyes. Owners eventually tied these knots with brightly colored ribbons to help them identify their dogs from afar.
See? Manly reasons all.
Posted by: Ted at
11:26 AM | category: Links
Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 173 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: jim at February 12, 2004 11:36 AM (zE10C)
2
I'd say something witty and sarcastic but since we own a Chihuahua I'm gonna keep my mouth shut.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at February 12, 2004 03:40 PM (UquFN)
3
I'm with you 100%. One of the coolest dogs I've ever known was a standard poodle--50 or so pounds of good manly dog. I didn't know he was a poodle until they told me, because they never gave him one of those froo-froo haircuts.
Posted by: victor at February 12, 2004 04:52 PM (L3qPK)
4
*cough*bullsh*t*cough*
Not buying it. Poodles are Frog dogs.
Posted by: Kin at February 12, 2004 05:57 PM (v7G5i)
5
Poodles actually have good guarding instincts. The only problem is they have acquired that "sissy dog" reputation and when someone encounters a poodle they are less likely to take it seriously.
This is a problem for the dog because a lot of a guard/watch dog's arsenal has to do with bluff and if your body language tells the dog that you don't believe it the dog will typically back down.
Except for the dogs I mentioned on my "Dog Eat Dogma Post" some time ago. Don't fuck with any of those breeds.
Posted by: The Meatriarchy at February 12, 2004 06:21 PM (x3H0D)
6
I can believe it.
Kind of OT, but still related: my husband and I were driving through our neighborhood the other day, on our way back from some errand. We saw a great big dude with a full beard and tattoos walking a tiny little pomeranian.
My husband grinned, "That's one guy I'd never mess with."
"Why not?"
"Because he's so secure in his manhood he can go out in public with a puppy cat and keep a straight face."
I thought that was a pretty good point.
Posted by: Linda at February 13, 2004 08:06 PM (mmKG+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 10, 2004
Be unpredictable
For Valentine's Day, don't give your loved one just any old plushy, give a
Santa Cthulhu, because nothing says eternal love like a fictional ancient god. Cupid? What a wuss.
Now maybe you want to keep the kids busy while you get 'thanked' for your thoughtfulness. What better way than to stick with the theme? Your little shoggoths can entertain themselves with a Cthulhu hand puppet. They'll have hours of fun reenacting The Doom That Came To Sarnath and The Dunwhich Horror. For extra fun, check eBay for out-of-print copies of Lovecraft audiobooks that they can listen to. And if they hear strange noises coming from your bedroom, it just adds to the atmosphere, eh?
"It's ok honey, mommy's fine. She's just being eaten by an Old One."
Posted by: Ted at
05:03 AM | category: Links
Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ooh! Shoggoth plushies!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 10, 2004 11:52 AM (jtW2s)
2
"It's ok honey, mommy's fine. She's just being eaten by an Old One."
Perv. At least this time it wasn't *me* making with the "Old Ted" joke.
Posted by: Victor at February 10, 2004 12:03 PM (L3qPK)
3
I haven't got Santa Cthulhu, but I do have the Original, as well as Goth Cthulhu.
The rival Old Ones preside over my desk.
And remember: Cthulhu Loathes You.
Posted by: Linda at February 11, 2004 08:05 PM (mmKG+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 09, 2004
February 07, 2004
Anti-Valentine's Day
Ever notice that the cost of roses goes up in the week before Valentine's Day? In our years of wedded bliss, I've mostly ignored Valentine's Day (beyond a simple card), although every few years I'll get Liz candy or flowers, and a couple of times I got her a gift every day for the week leading up to it (balloons, stuffed animal, jewelry, etc). I don't want to become predictable and have her get bored with me, at least that's what I tell her. Truth is, I can't be bothered to care about a lame made-up holiday.*
Now this site nails it: Be My Anti-Valentine. Send one of their cards any ol' time, just because.
Thanks to Squipper for that link! Also, for those less romantically-challenged than I (or if you're in the doghouse, you unfeeling bastard), and you're looking for unique jewelry ideas, try here.
*For those who think that statement might be useful as blackmail fodder, think again. Liz knows my feelings about it, and it frustrates the bejeebers outta her.
Posted by: Ted at
11:33 AM | category: Links
Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks so much for the links! -- I'm just reading through your blog now and suspect I'll be adding you to my lobster - I mean - blog roll :-)
Posted by: Cindy at February 07, 2004 03:39 PM (i1ipe)
2
Okay, I just finished reading 'about Ted' -- I'm impressed. #45 stuck out in my mind, as well as the fact that you've been to the Dakotas and I've got them at the top of my list of must-visit US states. Don't be surprised if more comments show up in here from me as I continue my Ted journey. :-)
Posted by: Cindy at February 07, 2004 03:50 PM (i1ipe)
3
I can't ignore Valentine's day, it's my wedding anniversary. And no, we didn't do it on purpose - it was just the only good day for months on either side. But for the romantically challenged, it has certain advantages - like being impossible to forget. This year (#5) I'll have to be clever, cause the wife's band has a gig that night.
Posted by: buckethead at February 08, 2004 04:27 PM (vK6yT)
4
"wife's band"? Tell us more!
Posted by: Ted at February 09, 2004 01:36 PM (blNMI)
5
Shawn and I are planning a "Bizarro Valentine's Day," and we're trying to come up with trailer-trash, non-romantic ways to celebrate. Something tells me we'll go to a greasy spoon diner and a strip club, and there will definitely be no sex that day (not that THAT would ever be a question there!).
Posted by: Dawn at February 09, 2004 09:33 PM (Q0xHi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 06, 2004
Feel free to steal this idea
I was wondering what it would be like to have a theme party where everyone had to dress up like one of the "
Real Men of Genius" in those Bud beer commercials. Imagine a room full of "Mr. Tiny Thong Bikini Wearer" and "Mr. Really Bad Toupee Wearer" guys.
If you do this, please take plenty of pictures let me know how it turns out.
Thanks to Victor for the inspiration (translation: blame him). Also, fellow Munuvian Tuning Spork has posted a wonderful parody here (can you parody a parody? why does the word 'parody' look funny?). Oh well, back to the Sporkster, the man is a genius, a real man of genius.
Posted by: Ted at
06:32 AM | category: Links
Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 125 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't know if I'd call it parody, it's really more of a rip-off. mheh. It seemed like it'd be more fun than just doing a straight rant about them $%@ pop-up ads. Ooo! I just came up with another idea! but it's a secret for now....
Posted by: Tuning Spork at February 06, 2004 02:34 PM (cvCom)
2
Whatever, Spork, it was funnier than cat piss.
Hey, for that party, I got dibs on Mr. Company Computer Guy, since that's what I am in real life. Heh.
Posted by: Victor at February 06, 2004 05:05 PM (16A49)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 05, 2004
Hint: keep the flamey end down
Another 'rocket' out there in the ecosystem:
The Rocketsled to Hell.
Posted by: Ted at
08:02 AM | category: Links
Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Our Rocket theme is becomming quite popular isn't it Ted? Although I know you were here long before me.
Posted by: Rocket Man Blg at February 05, 2004 12:40 PM (D4mP3)
2
Must be a conservative thing.

Rocket Man, Rocket Jones, Rocket Penguin, and now Rocketsled to Hell. The meek shall inherit the earth, we'll be busy exploring out there.
Posted by: Ted at February 05, 2004 01:29 PM (blNMI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 02, 2004
January 29, 2004
Go say hello
Josh Cagan, who doesn't like you, writes stuff like this:
It's for a jury to decide. Although, in a case where it's Solomon vs. the Hiltons, how does one assemble a jury of peers? Do you try to find 12 millionaire scumbags? Or six millionaires, and six scumbags?
Or do you just save yourself the headache, and clone Larry Flynt 11 times? But then, would you let them retain their ability to walk, or do you shoot them in the spine as soon as they come out of the cloning chamber? Or do you let half walk, and shoot the other half in the spine, you know, for balance?
This is why I'm not a lawyer. I'm far too thoughtful. And I'm off my point.
Posted by: Ted at
08:52 PM | category: Links
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.
January 28, 2004
A little innocence can be a dangerous thing
Absolutely work safe, I promise.
cummingfirst.com
Thanks to TL Hines for the pointer, his take on it is priceless.
Posted by: Ted at
09:36 PM | category: Links
Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Their acronym, CFUMC, is nearly unfortunate too. Good thing it's not Cummings United First...
Posted by: Matt Navarre at January 28, 2004 11:08 PM (n/wkr)
2
Since I live right down the road from Cumming, GA I can assure everyone that jokes like this are very common. Kind of like the small town between Atlanta and Athens called 'Between'. Or the little town outside Sparks, GA called Hell.
Posted by: Michael Mealling at January 29, 2004 07:03 PM (T4ZVa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 27, 2004
Withdrawal
Football season is almost over. It's too cold to start playing baseball. I'd feel bad if I cross-checked Mookie into the fence playing backyard hockey (I'd still do it, but I'd feel bad). Basketball? This time of year you spend an hour waiting for the next 10 minute game to start down at the Y. So what should the sports-minded among us do?
Calvin-ball. Leagues forming now.
Posted by: Ted at
06:38 PM | category: Links
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
January 26, 2004
January 25, 2004
A couple of links*
The snow is beginning to fall, accumulation tonight is expected to be 4"-8" (historically we're on the light end in my neighborhood), and they're calling for a second wave consisting mainly of freezing rain and sleet. Boy howdy.
Wow. The weather report just said that this pattern could go right through wednesday. Alternating waves of snow and sleet.
I spent late last night watching crappy horror movies (The Night Evelyn Came Out of the Grave, Blood Tide, and some Frankenstein I can't recall the exact title of), and this morning watching a couple of John Wayne movies (circa 1934 - The Lucky Texan and 'Neath Arizona Skies), wrapped around a trip to the grocery store and raking those dang monkey balls out of the backyard. I also did a little indoor gardening - nothing illegal mind you - trying to overwinter a few favorite plants from the garden. Mixed results so far, a couple are really thriving, a couple aren't doing so hot. Nothing dead yet though.
The main reason for the grocery run was to pick up some EV Olive Oil, Balsamic Vinegar and a loaf of Italian bread. Yesterday at the mall, SilverBlue and I sampled some incredible bread dipping oil. Rather than spending $15 for a bottle, I decided to try making my own. After buying small bottles of the two main ingredients, that price doesn't seem so out of line.
Early taste tests are promising, I'll post what I did later. When I asked Mookie to try it, she immediately gave me a detailed critique. The mall is across the street from her high school, and she and her friends often go into that particular store to sample the goodies. She's very familiar with the various bread dipping oils they offer. Who knew?
Speaking of crappy horror movies (I know, clumsy... sue me) kinda like this story over at Travelling Shoes. Where we read:
British use of cluster bombs in the Iraq war could count as a war crime and justifies further investigation by the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor in the Hague, a group of international lawyers say.
"The U.S. cannot be tried before the court because it refuses to sign up to it. The UK did."
If you remember all the way back to May of 2002, the Bush administration had decided that there was a strong likelihood that any International Criminal Court would be used as a means of persuing politically-motivated war-crimes charges against American soldiers and officials. And so the president "unsigned" the Clinton-era treaty which had tentatively committed the United States to participate in the court.
That decision now looks prescient.
You should go read the whole thing.
Jay at Sophont passes on the word that the Whole Earth magazine has closed it's doors. I remember their catalogs.
Say Uncle has this post about identifying Pit Bulls. Well worth a look.
More Mars stuff from Minor Perfidy Minister Bucket.
Sometimes there's no good way to end one of these posts, ya know?
*and a whole heap o' rambling on, eh?
Posted by: Ted at
08:40 PM | category: Links
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 517 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Odd, we have the almost identical weather forecast...did northern Virgina move to the vicinity of the Great Lakes when I wasn't looking?
Posted by: Susie at January 26, 2004 12:38 AM (0+cMc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Now *This* is one mad cow
Here. (warning:
language alert, might wanna swallow that drink too.)
Posted by: Ted at
08:10 PM | category: Links
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.
Happy Birthday!
Today the excellent blog by
Publicola is one year old! Stop by and say hi, and if you read a bit, you might find yourself returning often. He's that good.
Not to mention that the man downright knows his funk.
Posted by: Ted at
05:33 PM | category: Links
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
69kb generated in CPU 0.0955, elapsed 0.1838 seconds.
83 queries taking 0.1592 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.