August 03, 2005
Dharma & Greg: "Much Ado About Nothing", aka The Seinfeld Plot.
Dharma and her friend Jane vie for possesion of a stuffed duck, awarded to the couple who has sex in the most unusual place. Dharma comes up with the idea of doing it on the steps of City Hall during the airing of the last episode of Seinfeld, since everyone will be inside watching TV. While planning the caper, Greg's very conservative parents learn of the plot and are apalled. Jane interferes and Dharma and Greg are busted. Sitting in the police station, Greg's parents are brought in for the same thing, it seems they were inspired. When it comes out that the parents actually consumated their lovemaking, as opposed to Dharma and Greg's arrestus interuptus, Jane and Dharma award the duck to Greg's parents. Looking at the stuffed waterfowl, Greg's dad says, "This is a goose".
To which Dharma replies, "That doesn't rhyme."
I laughed so hard my sides hurt.
Posted by: Ted at
05:31 AM | category: Square Pegs
Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 203 words, total size 1 kb.
August 01, 2005
The scare quotes are mine. There is no evidence at this time that points to anything except a tragic accident.
This doesn't encourage me:
Garang, who earned a doctorate from Iowa State University, is seen as the sole figure with the weight to give southern Sudanese a role in the Khartoum government, which they deeply mistrust.
You know, the Islamic government that routinely bombs it's own non-Muslim people in refugee camps. The government that refuses to acknowlege the thriving slave trade going on where Islamic northerners kidnap Christians and Animists living in the south. Yeah, that government. And now the main player in the mix for the infidel south has died in an aircraft accident.
He also was a strong voice against outright secession by the south, calling instead for autonomy and power-sharing.Sudanese have celebrated the power-sharing agreement — and a new constitution signed afterward — as opening a new chapter of peace and as a chance to resolve other bloody conflicts in Sudan, including the humanitarian crisis in the western region of Darfur. Garang was also seen as a great hope for peace in Darfur.
Some hated him because they saw no need for power-sharing, they already had the power. Others wanted secession and civil war, despite being hopelessly outmatched and the near-certainty that the government would have gleefully accelerated their systematic destruction of their southern population. You know, the one's not under Sharia law.
The article tries hard to be upbeat about the continuing prospects for peace, indicating that no Rwandan-style buildup to violence has been noted. Of course, no buildup was noticed in Rwanda either before almost one million people were massacred in three months. Everyone is saying the right words, but some things aren't adding up quite yet. It could be the confusion of the moment, and the situation may clear up as details emerge.
But we've seen similar circumstances before.
I hope I'm wrong. I won't be surprised if I'm not.
Posted by: Ted at
06:08 AM | category: Square Pegs
No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 348 words, total size 2 kb.
68 queries taking 0.0886 seconds, 184 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.